[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:16:00 +0100

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:

    Scott> My reply is getting a little off-topic, but on the same
    Scott> note, why haven't we seen a widely-used XML-based HTML
    Scott> preprocessor language yet?

Pre-processors are just bad. (If you mean macro processors, that
is. If you mean transformation languages, such as XSLT, then you have
the answer to your own question.)
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Thread	RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Date	RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor


	Keywords xslt