[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT
Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT From: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:59:38 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 16:31, Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx> wrote: > VB.NET has XML literals mapping to the LINQ to XML types like XDocument and > XElement. VB.NET has it? Ok, I don't do VB (people still use that?! :), but I'll perhaps look into it. > And JavaScript has E4X, native XML and XMLList data types. It has taken us, um, what, 10 years from XML to XML support in JavaScript, even so in a very primitive way? Ok, maybe that's unfair, as I'm sure people thought that DOM would take care of it, but still ... Alex -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps ------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ --------
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Martin Honnen | Thread | Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Colin Paul Adams | Date | [xsl] Making Two Variables In To On, Ronnie Royston |
Month |
Keywords