xml editor

Supported platforms

Compatible with Windows7 & Mac OS X Snow Leopard

Ready for data server software
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection()


Subject: Re: [xsl] which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection()
From: Mario Madunic <hajduk@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:02:35 -0700

I second that!

Quoting Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>:

> 2008/6/26 Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> I know we are only talking milliseconds here and what I'm currently
> working on
> >> is just over 100 docs. But when it comes down to the other projects I work
> on
> >> and it is now 10's of thousands if not 100's of thousands of docs then
> >> efficiency might come into play.
> >
> > Won't memory come into play first - unless you use something like
> > saxon:discard-document() those 100s of thousands of docs will all be
> > held in memory....
> 
> I should add this would be another ideal case for an xslt front end to
> an xml database....
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Welch
> http://andrewjwelch.com
> Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/


Current Thread
Keywords
XML Editor | XML Author | WYSIWYG Editors | Schema Editor | XSD Documentation | XSL/XSLT Editor | XQuery | XML Databases | SVN Client
© 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor