[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Robert Koberg wrote:
How is that relevant?
Yes.
Hm. I think my XSLT needs document only in a few special cases (such as, for instance, <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest.xml>), where it *seems* to work.
The problem that I see over here is that the HTML transformation result appears without CSS styling applied.
BR, Julian
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 support in browsers, as of June 2008
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 support in browsers, as of June 2008 From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:07:45 +0200 |
Robert Koberg wrote:
Hi,
Why do you want static content transformed in the browser?
How is that relevant?
I think I found the o;?rfc2629.xslt here: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629.xslt
Yes.
I would bet your Opera problems are because it (still) does not support the document function.
Hm. I think my XSLT needs document only in a few special cases (such as, for instance, <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest.xml>), where it *seems* to work.
The problem that I see over here is that the HTML transformation result appears without CSS styling applied.
BR, Julian
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 support in brows, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 support in brows, Robert Koberg |
[xsl] value-of select - then multip, j milo taylor | Date | RE: [xsl] value-of select - then mu, Michael Kay |
Month |
Keywords