[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Trevor Nicholls schrieb:
Michael Ludwig
Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing question
Subject: Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing question From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:35:11 +0200 |
Trevor Nicholls schrieb:
[...] Currently I use xsltproc for a large number of small transforms because the performance edge over a 2.0 processor adds up to a significant time saving in the full build [...]
In case you actually use the command line processor instead of the LibXSLT API, additional time saving can be made using one of programming APIs, like Perl or Python.
Same story, of course, for Saxon. Saxon is fast - it's just the JVM startup overhead that slows things down when incurred repeatedly via a batch script. So if you program your large number of small transforms into the Saxon API, I can't imagine it'll be that much slower than LibXSLT; depending on the nature of your transform, it may even be faster.
Michael Ludwig
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Oxford Summer Schools on TEI , James Cummings |
Month |