[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:41:35 -0600, Jesper Tverskov <jesper@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sure. But instead of attempting to make two incompatible formats compatible, as per my follow-up comment to Robert, why not use an XPath abstraction layer to make that happen?
M. David Peterson
Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
Email: m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | m.david@xxxxxx
Mobile: (206) 999-0588
http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 08:45:06 -0600 |
On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:41:35 -0600, Jesper Tverskov <jesper@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But considering that XSLT is dedicated to transformation I feel that XSLT should have its own xml2json and json2xml funcrions that can work together.
Sure. But instead of attempting to make two incompatible formats compatible, as per my follow-up comment to Robert, why not use an XPath abstraction layer to make that happen?
-- /M:D
M. David Peterson
Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
Email: m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | m.david@xxxxxx
Mobile: (206) 999-0588
http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, Jesper Tverskov | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, Jesper Tverskov | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, M. David Peterson |
Month |