[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?
Subject: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?
From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:53:50 +0200
|
I stumbled upon these two statements, both by Colin Paul Adams.
As for Gestalt versus xsltproc [...] Xsltproc will run faster,
but is non-compliant to the XSLT 1.0 recommendation.
-- http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/200701/post40510.html
[...] when I still used XSLT [1.0, M. L.], I would use xsltproc
for my processor, due to its famed speed (I wasn't aware of its
non-compliance at the time) [...]
-- http://colina.demon.co.uk/?q=node/20
What exactly does xsltproc's (that is: LibXSLT's) non-compliance (with
the spec, I guess) consist in? And is there a standard test suite of
XSLT programs to determine a processor's compliance?
The other day I noticed that for a particular case, xsltproc produces a
different result than its fellow processors. Has this difference been
determined in more general terms?
http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/200804/msg00241.html
Michael Ludwig
|
