[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] fallback to a default template in xsl processing
Subject: Re: [xsl] fallback to a default template in xsl processing From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:08:19 +0100 |
> is it ok to just keep adding to the expression? e.g., OK as in it'll work, yes. On the other hand I was just guessing what your real requirement is from the example you posted and I suspect that that is not it. Is it really the case that if the first element is SUBROUTINE (or friends) you want to silently discard all following elements, but if SUBROUTINE (or friends) occurs in any other position you want to process all elements in document order. If that is what you need, then, as you see, you can have that; but it seems a slightly strange requirement which is reflected in the slightly awkward coding of a long bunch of self::SUBROUTINE or self::LIST or ... tests. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] fallback to a default tem, Daly, April | Thread | RE: [xsl] fallback to a default tem, Daly, April |
RE: [xsl] fallback to a default tem, Daly, April | Date | RE: [xsl] fallback to a default tem, Daly, April |
Month |