[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Abel Braaksma schrieb:
http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/200803/msg00567.html
http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/200804/msg00241.html
Michael
Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper structure, position(), xsl:key
Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper structure, position(), xsl:key From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:16:39 +0200 |
Abel Braaksma schrieb:
On a side note: some processors are known to do internal optimizations that are equal or even better then hand crafted key optimizations. I believe for XSLT 1.0 the .NET processor is one of those highly optimized ones, and for XSLT 2.0 I believe that Saxon starts to be increasingly more optimized with each new version.
I'm still quite new to XSLT, so I keep "discovering things". The other day, I discovered that given two algorithms to solve a problem, which one performs better may be a question of which processor you use. I also noticed that Saxon seems to scale best, despite JVM overhead with respect to LibXSLT or Xalan-C.
http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/200803/msg00567.html
For my work, I'm restricted to LibXSLT (so XSL 1.0), as that's what PHP comes with support for. I'm happy with it, except here:
http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/200804/msg00241.html
Michael
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper stru, Abel Braaksma | Thread | [xsl] XSLT Programmer's Reference 4, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Cannot process a result t, ALEXCONTINI@xxxxxxxx | Date | [xsl] Create XML, IZASKUN GUTIERREZ GU |
Month |