[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
My impression was that the goal was to correctly execute valid XSLT 1.0 stylesheets, and a non-goal to specify anything about invalid XSLT 1.0 stylesheets.
John
bryan rasmussen wrote:
Re: [xsl] An (almost) identity stylesheet
Subject: Re: [xsl] An (almost) identity stylesheet From: John Snelson <john.snelson@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:28:47 +0100 |
My impression was that the goal was to correctly execute valid XSLT 1.0 stylesheets, and a non-goal to specify anything about invalid XSLT 1.0 stylesheets.
John
bryan rasmussen wrote:
why was that choice made?
Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Using xsl:attribute with @select in a 1.0 transformation provokes avariety of reactions from processors. Xalan C++ 1.10.0 throws an error, LibXSLT 10120 ignores it, Saxon 9.0.0.2J processes @select as if allowed.
That's because it *is* allowed. When you use an XSLT 2.0 processor, you can use XSLT 2.0 syntax, even if your stylesheet specifies version="1.0".
Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
-- John Snelson, Oracle Corporation http://snelson.org.uk/john Berkeley DB XML: http://www.oracle.com/database/berkeley-db/xml XQilla: http://xqilla.sourceforge.net
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] An (almost) identity styl, bryan rasmussen | Thread | RE: [xsl] An (almost) identity styl, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] An (almost) identity styl, bryan rasmussen | Date | RE: [xsl] An (almost) identity styl, Michael Kay |
Month |
Keywords