RE: [xsl] Difference in priority of node() and *

Subject: RE: [xsl] Difference in priority of node() and *
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:08:07 -0000

> Can this be thought as bug in the spec? Is it appropriate to 
> put it in W3C bigzilla.

It's certainly not a bug - there was a conscious decision that the default
priorities could not reflect subsumption relationships in all cases. Some
might consider that the design could be improved, but it's the kind of thing
that one can't change retrospectively for reasons of compatibility.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Difference in priority of node() and *, (continued)
- Martin Honnen - 15 Feb 2008 17:13:13 -0000
  - Mukul Gandhi - 15 Feb 2008 17:22:06 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 15 Feb 2008 18:22:46 -0000
    - Mukul Gandhi - 16 Feb 2008 04:02:26 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 16 Feb 2008 09:08:28 -0000 <=
    - Mukul Gandhi - 16 Feb 2008 13:07:05 -0000
    - David Carlisle - 16 Feb 2008 13:16:24 -0000
    - Mukul Gandhi - 16 Feb 2008 13:35:19 -0000
    - David Carlisle - 16 Feb 2008 13:47:44 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Difference in priority of, Mukul Gandhi	Thread	Re: [xsl] Difference in priority of, Mukul Gandhi
Re: [xsl] How to test the parent na, Vyacheslav Sedov	Date	RE: [xsl] How to test the parent na, Michael Kay
	Month

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

RE: [xsl] Difference in priority of node() and *