[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling

Subject: Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:12:57 GMT

> Wouldn't
> "xml-" be the most appropriate prefix here?

No, such names are reserved for other use. You can call it result-xml or
_xml_result or pretty much anything you like. Why trample on the
reserved names?

even w3c specs avoid doing this, consider xslt for example an early draft
had an attribute xml-declaration on xsl:output,
but they thought better of it and changed to
omit-xml-declaration
http://www.w3.org/1999/08/WD-xslt-19990813#section-XML-Output-Method

David

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda	Thread	RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda
RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda	Date	RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor


	Keywords xslt