[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Poor man's test suite
Subject: Re: [xsl] Poor man's test suite From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:54:09 +0100 |
http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/ cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On Dec 19, 2007 9:51 AM, Jesper Tverskov <jesper@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi list > > Normally a stylesheet don't need that much testing, the input is > known. But when trying to make a stylesheet like my "Identity > transformation for XSLT 2.0", the stylesheet must be able to handle > any well-formed input no matter how weird. > > I am not used to that kind of heavy testing. What do we have of > "official" collections of all sorts of XML documents for testing > purposes and how can we be sure that they really cover all the > weirdness like XML declarations looking like the following: > > <?xml > version > = > "1.0" > ?> > > or markup inside CDATA sections in elements in comments inside PIs, etc? > > Do we have any tutorials about where we most often have the problems, > what to look for and be beware off et cetera? Even a checklist or 10 > rules of thumb could be of great help? > > Cheers, > Jesper Tverskov
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Poor man's test suite, Jesper Tverskov | Thread | Re: [xsl] Poor man's test suite, David Carlisle |
[xsl] Poor man's test suite, Jesper Tverskov | Date | [xsl] xsl-fo hidden areas within pd, Werner Putzhuber |
Month |