[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Ok, I don't want to labor the point. Surely the input to a key is specified by the tag. All I'm suggesting is that keys should do what I consider to be the natural thing, behave consistently; aggregate instances of the tags they see.
On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
Re: [xsl] Calling subdocuments with processing directives
Subject: Re: [xsl] Calling subdocuments with processing directives From: Steven Ericsson-Zenith <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:20:48 -0700 |
Ok, I don't want to labor the point. Surely the input to a key is specified by the tag. All I'm suggesting is that keys should do what I consider to be the natural thing, behave consistently; aggregate instances of the tags they see.
With respect, Steven -- Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith Institute for Advanced Science & Engineering http://iase.info http://senses.info
On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
It is because there is no defined order that I find it counter intuitive to have to make what is essentially and order specification. From a functional point of view a key really should aggregate IMHO.
But someone has to tell it what to aggregate over. A function expects to be
told what its input is.
Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Calling subdocuments with, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] [XSL]Selecting Sibling from t, Alice Ju-Hsuan Wei |
Re: [xsl] 'number-rows-spanned' doe, J.Pietschmann | Date | [xsl] Named template param - variab, Matthew Lindfield Se |
Month |