[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Scott
[Perhaps off-topic, feel free to email me directly.]
Why does your firm take that stance, are you saying they don't allow the use of any non-Microsoft .NET libraries?
Joe
RE: [xsl] Add numbers
Subject: RE: [xsl] Add numbers From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:54:13 +0100 |
Scott
[Perhaps off-topic, feel free to email me directly.]
Why does your firm take that stance, are you saying they don't allow the use of any non-Microsoft .NET libraries?
Just interested. --
Joe
From: "Scott Trenda" <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [xsl] Add numbers Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:51:11 -0500
I'm not saying it's a good thing, but it is what I have to work with. ;)
The other thing is that we're stuck with a proprietary preprocessor that's written in C. Are there any XSLT 2.0 processors that are implemented at the COM level? I don't know if there's any Java/.NET incantations that would allow our preprocessor to hook into the managed-code XSLT 2.0 implementations, but I'm almost certain that the higher-ups here wouldn't like it. :(
~ Scott
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:46 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Add numbers
> Point taken and noted. Unfortunately, at my work, we're stuck > using XSLT 1.0 until Microsoft gets around to releasing their > implementation of XSLT 2.0
That kind of supplier loyalty leaves me gobsmacked.
Even if you're planning to wait indefinitely, is it really good tactics to tell Microsoft this is your plan?
Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Scott Trenda | Thread | RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Colin Adams |
RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Scott Trenda | Date | RE: [xsl] Add numbers, Wendell Piez |
Month |
Keywords