[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode
Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:02:06 +0100
|
me>(@value,@name,.)[1]
wendell> ... and in XPath 1.0, you're forced into explicit testing, since
wendell> attributes have no order in the data model.
or, if you must, (@value|@name[not(../@value)]|.)[last()] but perhaps's
that's "explicit testing". How explicit does something have to be to be
"explicit"?
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
- Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode, (continued)
- Message not available
- Wendell Piez - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:04:13 -0400
- Message not available
- Steve - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:10:07 -0400
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:16:06 +0100
- Wendell Piez - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:24:21 -0400
- Message not available
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:02:06 +0100 <=
- Abel Braaksma - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:33:59 +0200
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:40:33 +0100
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:15:09 +0100
- Message not available
- Abel Braaksma - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:21:28 +0200
|