[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:39:34 -0600, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nicely stated! > http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/09/dr_michael_kayqotd_on_standard.html
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Re: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() function
Subject: Re: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() function From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:01:52 -0600 |
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:39:34 -0600, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Note that it's entirely conformant (and sometimes even useful) for an
implementation of document() to reject every URI you throw at it as "not
recognized" or "inaccessible". It's not conformant, however, to fail to
provide the function.
Interoperability and marketability, of course, demand rather more than mere
conformance.
Nicely stated! > http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/09/dr_michael_kayqotd_on_standard.html
-- /M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] access to preceding-sibling i, Simon Ruf |
Re: [xsl] [XSL] Accessing part of t, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Search text and write the, cknell |
Month |