[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 06:01:09 -0600, Colin Adams <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yup! And so now I'm asking for just a little more, making it a bit more clear this time around as to what it is specifically I am looking for. ;-)
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Re: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() function
Subject: Re: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() function From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 06:04:04 -0600 |
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 06:01:09 -0600, Colin Adams <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, that's compliant behaviour (the set of URI schemes supported is the empty set), so you got what you asked for!
Yup! And so now I'm asking for just a little more, making it a bit more clear this time around as to what it is specifically I am looking for. ;-)
-- /M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() , Colin Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() , Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Opera 9.5 and document() , Colin Adams | Date | [xsl] access to preceding-sibling i, Simon Ruf |
Month |