[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
As long as programming languages evovle they won't die :-) IMO.
Okay... I'll stop here.
-Rashmi
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead? From: "Rashmi Rubdi" <rashmi.sub@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:42:01 -0400 |
I hope I'm staying on-topic... when I was learning a particular programming language (and I know a few of them), other languages seemed better because of the (grass is greener on the other side effect).
But after a few years of being a programmer, I've realized that some languages continue to grow, improve, compete and adapt and stay current and it is the active community that uses a particular language changes it to it's current state.
Each programming language is suited for a purpose, so use the programming language that *you* know well and that accomplishes the task easily.
It would be insane to transform an XML doc into HTML with Java, or ASP - why not use a language that transforms it naturally?
As long as programming languages evovle they won't die :-) IMO.
One of the hardest lesson I've learned is, learning too many unrelated programming languges makes me a terrible JOATMON :-( , but it is good to learn a set of related languages. For example XHTML, CSS, XML,XSLT, XQuery go together, somewhat.
Okay... I'll stop here.
-Rashmi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Earley, Jim | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Katie Kearns |
RE: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Earley, Jim | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Katie Kearns |
Month |