[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
My preference here is to ask the question - Does the proposed "function" have side effects?
If yes, use xsl:call-template, if not use xsl:function.
_________________________________________________________________
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/
Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs named templates (Which is better?)
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs named templates (Which is better?) From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:24:29 +0000 |
From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Jernigan, TieSha wrote:So I have a fairly general question. I am using XSLT 2.0 and am interested in creating user defined functions. Which construct is better to use... xsl:function or a named template?
Indeed fairly general, but not easy to answer.
My preference here is to ask the question - Does the proposed "function" have side effects?
If yes, use xsl:call-template, if not use xsl:function.
_________________________________________________________________
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs named tem, Abel Braaksma | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl:function vs named tem, Michael Kay |
| Re: [xsl] FizzBuzz in XSLT 1.0. He, M. David Peterson | Date | SV: Re: [xsl] fo spaces, Mati Hadi |
| Month |
Keywords