[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] flatened hiearchies for xslt2
Subject: Re: [xsl] flatened hiearchies for xslt2 From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:33:15 GMT |
> unless Saxon performs some smart optimization. What do you think ? even if you don't use a key saxon (perhaps just in the -sa version, I can't remember) may decide you use some //foo[@x='aa'] idiom often enough to internally use a key anyway. I tend to think of for-each group as a sane syntax added at xslt2 for the muenchian grouping idiom that Dimitre showed, which works well, but only looks normal as its posted once a week for over half a decade to this list:-). No idea if the internal implementations are similar though but that's processor specific detail... David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] flatened hiearchies for x, ac | Thread | RE: [xsl] flatened hiearchies for x, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] flatened hiearchies for x, ac | Date | RE: [xsl] flatened hiearchies for x, Michael Kay |
Month |