[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML

Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML
From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:32:57 +0100 (CET)

Yves Forkl wrote:

  Hi

> From this line I understand that the XPath 2.0 "="
> operator allows to test an atomic value (like the string
> that the attribute value is coerced into) against a
> sequence and returns true if the atomic value equals any
> of the members of the sequence.

  Yes, while other things.

> If this is true, where I can find more information about
> this feature and its prerequisites? I have searched the
> relevant W3C specifications up and down, but in vain.

  This is in the XPath 2.0 REC:

    http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-general-comparisons

  Regards,

--drkm

___________________________________________________________________________ 
Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! 
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Getting WordprocessingML p style, (continued) David Carlisle - 2 Feb 2007 23:10:59 -0000 David Carlisle - 1 Feb 2007 10:23:14 -0000 Yves Forkl - 2 Feb 2007 13:10:47 -0000 Michael Kay - 2 Feb 2007 14:54:41 -0000 Florent Georges - 2 Feb 2007 15:33:37 -0000 <= David Carlisle - 2 Feb 2007 18:06:02 -0000 Mukul Gandhi - 1 Feb 2007 16:00:51 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, David Carlisle
RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Michael Kay	Date	[xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 2 Feb 200, Andy Carr1
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor


	Keywords xpath