[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Ben Stover wrote:
No, they don't even have to be in a file at all. A repository, a database, some web site, dynamic creation, in memory, as dom. You have plenty of options.
Mine are mostly in *.xslt files and in a repository (nameless), and *.fo for xsl-fo. However, it's all up to you whether you choose 'xxx' or 'yyy' or 'santaclaus' as extension (or none at all).
From what I know: none whatsoever.
Huge differences, depending on what you mean by "handling". XSLT 2 contains many new features and functions and makes a lot possible that previously was impossible (or very hard) in XSLT 1.
-- Abel
Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xsl/xslt stylesheets
Subject: Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xsl/xslt stylesheets From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:19:12 +0100 |
Ben Stover wrote:
Do XSL stylesheets ALWAYS have to be in a file with filen name extension *.xsl ?
No, they don't even have to be in a file at all. A repository, a database, some web site, dynamic creation, in memory, as dom. You have plenty of options.
What about XSLT docs in *.xslt or even in *.xml files?
Mine are mostly in *.xslt files and in a repository (nameless), and *.fo for xsl-fo. However, it's all up to you whether you choose 'xxx' or 'yyy' or 'santaclaus' as extension (or none at all).
Is there a must on how to name XSLT stylesheets or only a recommendation ?
From what I know: none whatsoever.
Are there differences in handling between XSLT 1.x and 2.0 versions ?
Huge differences, depending on what you mean by "handling". XSLT 2 contains many new features and functions and makes a lot possible that previously was impossible (or very hard) in XSLT 1.
-- Abel
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xs, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xs, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xs, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xs, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |