[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] question about identity transform
Subject: Re: [xsl] question about identity transform
From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:27:08 -0800
|
On 10/31/06, Bill French <bfh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I've used the identity transform many times to do useful things and have
often wondered about the match pattern. Why is the match pattern
"node() | @*"
rather than simply "node()"? Aren't attributes returned by node()?
node()
is abbreviation for:
child::node()
while
@*
is an abbreviation for:
attribute::node()
When no axis is specified only one (the child axis) is assumed.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
I read this and didn't find the answer:
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/identity.html
Regards
--Bill
|