[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] text() vs xs:string serialization (was: Re: [xsl] text extraction)
Subject: Re: [xsl] text() vs xs:string serialization (was: Re: [xsl] text extraction) From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:58:36 +0200 (CEST) |
"James A. Robinson" wrote: > Sorry, twas a stupid question -- you refer to both sections. Clearly > I need to sit down and wrap my head around the entire sequence > construction process. Yes, you're right (I refered to both sections). But it is not a stupid question. Because your code generates only text nodes, so it is not obvious that simple or complex content is constructed. But as all text nodes are attached to a document node at the end, it is 5.7.1 that applies. Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Demandez ` ceux qui savent sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] text() vs xs:string seria, James A. Robinson | Thread | [xsl] missing xsl: before schemaLoc, Lin, Jessica |
Re: [xsl] text extraction, Abel Braaksma | Date | RE: [xsl] text() vs xs:string seria, Michael Kay |
Month |