[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
As an implementor, you don't; see MK's earlier post.
There ya go. No doubt my brain was incorrectly wired-up by The Implementor.
Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated
Subject: Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated From: MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:45:28 +0100 |
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Jack" == MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Jack> Colin Paul Adams wrote:"Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In principle, you could use XSLT with a different expression language from XPath - this just happens to be non-conformant.
Michael> It's not non-conformant if it it's done using the Michael> Michael>Michael> <YPath:value-of select="ypath-expression"/>extensibility features of the language:Good point. I hope there's no demand for it though :-)
Jack> Really??? I find XSLT itself reasonably lucid; it's XPath Jack> that I find obscure and hard-to-remember.
Really. Speaking as an implementor, I don't want to have to implement another expression language.
As an implementor, you don't; see MK's earlier post.
But I don't find XPath obscure at all.
There ya go. No doubt my brain was incorrectly wired-up by The Implementor.
-- Jack.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometime, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometime, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometime, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometime, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |