[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?|
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:56:03 -0400
At 02:00 PM 7/12/2006, Colin wrote:
1) Performance - functional languages are stil slower than
imperative languages, although the gap is closing.
And this is an issue for only some XSLT applications (perhaps a
fairly small minority).
2) Large scale program structure - OO programming seems to have the
Yet without being an OO engineer, I'd guess also that sound OO design
enforces the same kinds of discipline through encapsulation and other
techniques. While XSLT doesn't offer this, exactly, certainly one
could modularize a solution (which is effectively what Dimitre has done).
(As I noted in an earlier message, it would be interesting to see
what solutions to the latest running total problem could be achieved
without FXSL but using "plain" XSLT 2.0. In contrast, FXSL recommends
itself both by being demonstrably capable, and by being already there
for the using.)
- Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?, (continued)
- Colin Adams - Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:00:23 +0100
- Steve - Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:24:05 -0400
- Message not available
- Wendell Piez - Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:42:09 -0400
- David Carlisle - Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:26:30 +0100
- Wendell Piez - Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:56:03 -0400 <=
- Dimitre Novatchev - Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:01:38 -0700
- Andrew Franz - Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:50:50 +1000
- Dimitre Novatchev - Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:48:07 -0700
- Andrew Franz - Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:33:16 +1000