[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice? From: "M. David Peterson" <xmlhacker@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:48:24 -0700 |
One last correction: Make the base of this foundation a combination of client-side and server-side XML transformation and query technologies that include a mixture of XSLT 1.0, 2.0, XPath 1.0, 2.0, XQuery 1.0, for Windows/.NET add to this LINQ and XLINQ. *AND EXSLT 1.0* (currently moving towards a final reccomendation in the foreseeable future of which several respected vendors have already commited to providing a compliant processor) On 3/3/06, M. David Peterson <xmlhacker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Besides the billion and a half spelling and grammar errors (Sorry > Wendell! :D you know me :D :D ) > this: > > > - When this happens, you will also have a much more extensive base of > > client-side XSLT processors that are limited to the same "play it > > EXTREMELY safe!" ... > > should read: > > > - When this happens, you will also have a much more extensive base of > > client-side XSLT processors that are *NOT* limited to the same "play it > > EXTREMELY safe!" ... > > Suggests a much different meaning otherwise. :) > > -- > <M:D/> > > M. David Peterson > http://www.xsltblog.com/ > -- <M:D/> M. David Peterson http://www.xsltblog.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, M. David Peterson | Thread | RE: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, Didier PH Martin |
[xsl] IE's conditional comments in , Manfred Staudinger | Date | Re: [xsl] IE's conditional comments, Chris Burdess |
Month |