Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice?
From: "M. David Peterson" <xmlhacker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:38:22 -0700

Besides the billion and a half spelling and grammar errors (Sorry Wendell! :D you know me :D :D ) > this: > - When this happens, you will also have a much more extensive base of > client-side XSLT processors that are limited to the same "play it > EXTREMELY safe!" ... should read: > - When this happens, you will also have a much more extensive base of > client-side XSLT processors that are *NOT* limited to the same "play it > EXTREMELY safe!" ... Suggests a much different meaning otherwise. :) -- <M:D/> M. David Peterson http://www.xsltblog.com/

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice?
- Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\) - 2 Mar 2006 18:07:15 -0000
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\) - 3 Mar 2006 19:36:31 -0000
    - M. David Peterson - 3 Mar 2006 21:32:51 -0000
      - M. David Peterson - 3 Mar 2006 21:38:37 -0000 <=
      - M. David Peterson - 3 Mar 2006 21:48:45 -0000
      - Didier PH Martin - 4 Mar 2006 01:18:01 -0000
      - M. David Peterson - 4 Mar 2006 05:37:12 -0000
      - Jesper Tverskov - 4 Mar 2006 09:18:37 -0000

<- Previous

Index

Next ->

Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, M. David Peterson

Thread

Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, M. David Peterson

Date

[xsl] IE's conditional comments in , Manfred Staudinger

Month