[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Hi,
If you are producing a regular-user website then I would echo everyone who responded - do it server side.
If all you need (eventually) is to change skins/look-and-feel you should be able to do that with CSS.
-Rob
andrew welch wrote:
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice? From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:23:23 -0500 |
Hi,
If you are producing a regular-user website then I would echo everyone who responded - do it server side.
If all you need (eventually) is to change skins/look-and-feel you should be able to do that with CSS.
-Rob
andrew welch wrote:
On 3/2/06, Gowri Ratakonda <gratakonda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andrew, Michael, Nathan, Charles, Jay,
Thanks a lot for responding to my mail! I will go with the client-side transformation becuase Michael suggested that it would be the right way to go if our goal is to publish dynamic pages.
Hmmm if that's the way you've read it ;-)
I would still argue perform all transformations server side, with all dynamic client-side functionality done using ajax.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, andrew welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, Didier PH Martin |
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, andrew welch | Date | Re: [xsl] service marks and other s, Andrew Franz |
Month |