[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Michael Kay wrote:
btw, thanks to all the XSL gurus around here, i've learned so much during the few days that i've been reading this list!
kind regards,
jvrn
Re: [xsl] is arity-based "polymorphism" safe to use in xsl 2.0 functions?
Subject: Re: [xsl] is arity-based "polymorphism" safe to use in xsl 2.0 functions? From: Joern Nettingsmeier <nettings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:47:37 +0100 |
Michael Kay wrote:
The spec allows you to write this because the designers thought it was useful, so go ahead and use it.
But I prefer the version at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#index-of-node
whew. two thirds shorter than mine. how depressing. :-D thanks for this very instructive pointer. must've overlooked it.
btw, thanks to all the XSL gurus around here, i've learned so much during the few days that i've been reading this list!
kind regards,
jvrn
-- jvrn nettingsmeier
home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/ http://spunk.dnsalias.org phone://+49/201/491621
if you are a free (as in "free speech") software developer and you happen to be travelling near my home, drop me a line and come round for a free (as in "free beer") beer. :-D
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] is arity-based "polymorph, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] problem adding namespace node, Majirus FANSI |
RE: [xsl] php:join() equiv in XSL/X, Florent Georges | Date | Re: [xsl] FW: XSL-FO print of stati, G. Ken Holman |
Month |
Keywords