RE: [xsl] vs

---

Subject: RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? From: drkm <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:44:38 +0100 (CET)

---

Eric Scheid wrote:

> Is there any way to control whether empty elements appear as
> <empty></empty>, instead of <empty/>?

> My problem is that some browsers don't like <div/> or
> <a name="x"/>,

  Browser?  So you use 'xhtml' or 'html' serialization method, don't
you?  If it's the case, you must don't get any element serialized as
"<empty/>" (but as "<empty></empty>" or "<empty>").

  See <URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization/>.

--drkm



















	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Tilichargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

---

Current Thread

[xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? Eric Scheid - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:21:49 +1100 G. Ken Holman - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:27:53 -0500 Michael Kay - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:36:23 -0000 drkm - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:44:38 +0100 (CET) <= Eric Scheid - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:33:51 +1100 drkm - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:40:50 +0100 (CET) Michael Kay - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:02:31 -0000 <Possible follow-ups> Eric Scheid - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:58:40 +1100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid
RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay	Date	RE: [xsl] Sorting the complete xml , Michael Kay
	Month