[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

[xsl] Re: XSLT Transformation .NET

Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT Transformation .NET
From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:48:21 -0700

I'm sorry, I left out my *rant* on .net datasets persisted to xml.
So, what is wrong with the original ADO save recordset as xml?  At
first glance, sure the xml was difficult to read, but truly is a great
xml document to work with!  Didn't anyone ever mention in the
microsoft camp there that xml elements named as field names is a bad
idea?  That it is a much more useful source if the xml elements are
all named the same?  Do I *rant* alone?

Karl..

Current Thread
[xsl] XSLT Transformation .NET Karl Stubsjoen - 4 Dec 2005 03:44:59 -0000 Karl Stubsjoen - 4 Dec 2005 03:51:16 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 4 Dec 2005 08:46:58 -0000 Message not available bryan rasmussen - 4 Dec 2005 09:00:04 -0000 Karl Stubsjoen - 4 Dec 2005 21:35:40 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
[xsl] XSLT Transformation .NET, Karl Stubsjoen	Thread	RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT Transformation ., Michael Kay
[xsl] XSLT Transformation .NET, Karl Stubsjoen	Date	[xsl] XSLT Processing w/ Embedded P, Michael B Allen
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor


	Keywords xml