[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"

Subject: Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code"
From: Jon Gorman <jonathan.gorman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:46:07 -0600

On 11/30/05, Karr, David <david.karr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience
> have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT
> vs. "raw Java code"?

To ask a stupid question, I'm not really sure what you mean by "raw
Java code" here.  Do you mean processing the xml file via other
mechanims (raw text processing, SAX, DOM, etc) or are you just talking
about "compiled" scripts vs uncompiled scripts?  Bytecod issues?

Don't forget after all that there are XSLT processors that aren't Java
based. Would you compare xsltproc against ...something?

Sorry, a bit tired today and my brain keeps trying to figure this out.

Jon Gorman

Current Thread
[xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code" Karr, David - 30 Nov 2005 17:57:21 -0000 Michael Kay - 30 Nov 2005 18:40:54 -0000 Jon Gorman - 30 Nov 2005 18:48:05 -0000 <= Geert Josten - 30 Nov 2005 21:36:23 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Geert Josten
RE: [xsl] Error: when distance betw, Michael Kay	Date	Re: [xsl] passing parameters betwee, watchstone@xxxxxxxxx
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor


	Keywords xml xslt