[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Mm, perhaps I should have said "no *reasonable* way"? :->
I guess I'm being just too categorical today. I keep count()-based tests buried in a drawer in my brain even deeper than the name tests. Yikes, who needs em?
At 05:10 PM 11/4/2005, David wrote:
Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Change of Attribute Value
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Change of Attribute Value From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:04:45 -0500 |
Mm, perhaps I should have said "no *reasonable* way"? :->
I guess I'm being just too categorical today. I keep count()-based tests buried in a drawer in my brain even deeper than the name tests. Yikes, who needs em?
Cheers, Wendell
At 05:10 PM 11/4/2005, David wrote:
> Bottom line is that XPath 1.0 gives no way to select all attributes > *except* a given one other than the resort to the name test.
> XPath 2.0 can select "@* except attribute(xyz)", which is very nice.
which means in xpath 1 you can select
@*[count(.|../@xyz)=2] which is even nicer?
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Change of Attribu, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Change of Attribu, David Carlisle |
[xsl] XML 2005: Call for Posters, Kate Hamilton | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Change of Attribu, David Carlisle |
Month |