[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] XML source size vs . XSLT performance
Subject: [xsl] XML source size vs . XSLT performance From: Jacquo Johnson <genxgeek@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:57:04 -0600 |
I have a perl application that calls two stored procs, each returning multiple result sets. Currently I concatenate the multiple result sets from each stored proc into one xml document. Worst case the xml document can get up to 300k in size (when both results from each stored proc are concatenated). Currently, I'm using Xalan to run a stylesheet on that document but I'm wondering if 300k is too big of an xml document for Xalan to transform. So, my question is should I break it up into two parts (two xml documents one from each stored proc call) or are there any limitations with xslt and the size of an xml source document in relation to performance? Thanks.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSL plug-in or IDE, Oleg Konovalov | Thread | RE: [xsl] XML source size vs . XSLT, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Re: xml:space problem WAS : P, Kenneth Stephen | Date | Re: [xsl] output encoding problem (, Joe Fawcett |
Month |