RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transform" became the term for the type ofthing XSLT does?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transform" became the term for the type ofthing XSLT does?
From: "Andrew Welch" <ajwelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:58:08 +0100

I bet everyone still uses <xsl:stylesheet> over <xsl:transform> (I know
I do...even though it makes far more sense to use the latter!)

cheers
andrew

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transform" became the term for the type ofthing XSLT does? Andrew Welch - Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:58:08 +0100 <= Colin Paul Adams - 14 Jun 2005 10:06:50 +0100 Peter Gerstbach - Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:39:46 +0200 <Possible follow-ups> Andrew Welch - Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:24:42 +0100 Andrew Welch - Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:38:15 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] converting quot to " in X, Andrew Welch	Thread	Re: [xsl] Anybody know when "transf, Colin Paul Adams
RE: [xsl] converting quot to " in X, tomas.vanek	Date	Re: [xsl] Anybody know when "transf, Colin Paul Adams
	Month

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transform" became the term for the type ofthing XSLT does?