RE: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)

Subject: RE: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: Kevin Rodgers <kevin.rodgers@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:08:58 -0600

Michael Kay writes:
> It's not really any worse than the fact that (in XQuery notation) (<a/> is
> <a/>) return false. In fact, the problem is even there in XSLT 1.0.

Uh oh, hot dog!

-- 
Kevin Rodgers

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Better include them in th, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams
[xsl] Using <xsl:for-each> and posi, David Gadd	Date	RE: [xsl] Using <xsl:for-each> and , Aron Bock
	Month

Keywords

xquery
xslt

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

RE: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)