[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
I was reading this blog http://blog.parthenoncomputing.com/dbxml/archives/2005/02/faq_how_do_i_ge_1.html and am confused here.
I am trying to look if the word blah exists in the entire document.
Is there any difference between the performance of the above two??
Is the using of string() function as suggested in the blog right way to do what I want... because I read in one book that string() only matches the first element found and does not go thru the entire document trying to match all elements found.
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee. Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
[xsl] text() function
Subject: [xsl] text() function From: "Sameer N" <samooo_vc@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:46:26 -0700 |
I was reading this blog http://blog.parthenoncomputing.com/dbxml/archives/2005/02/faq_how_do_i_ge_1.html and am confused here.
I am trying to look if the word blah exists in the entire document.
Is there any difference between //*[conatins(text(), "blah")] and //*[conatins( . , "blah")]
Is there any difference between the performance of the above two??
Is the using of string() function as suggested in the blog right way to do what I want... because I read in one book that string() only matches the first element found and does not go thru the entire document trying to match all elements found.
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee. Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] QName from variable, Norbert Heidbrink | Thread | Re: [xsl] text() function, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] First attempt at xsl:resu, JBryant | Date | Re: [xsl] text() function, G. Ken Holman |
Month |