[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
|
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:47:42 +0100 |
> Anyway it would be interesting to see some more detailed study about > integration of subsetted RNG into XSLT 2.0. It would indeed. Nice to know there's no danger of running out of things to do. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev |
| [xsl] Upgrading Saxon XSLT 1.0 supp, G. Ken Holman | Date | RE: RE: REx6: [xsl] GMT to BST conv, cknell |
| Month |
Keywords