[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
|
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:08:20 +0100 |
> Why it can't be... let's say RNG ? :o) > Much of the elegance of RNG derives from the fact that it doesn't try to associate types with nodes, it only does validation. Michael Kay
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek |
| Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, David Carlisle |
| Month |