[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:00:38 +1000 |
Hi Jeni, On 4/19/05, Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dimitre, > > > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to > > define user data types inline in a stylesheet -- forcing the > > programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition > > from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :( > > Since the November 2004 Working Draft, you can nest a (WXS) schema > within an <xsl:import-schema> element, so you can define data types > within the stylesheet module if you want. This only applies to > Schema-Aware XSLT processors, of course. Then we have two quite different languages. Cheers, Dimitre. > > Cheers, > > Jeni > > --- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Pawson, David | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay |
Month |