[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] On-the-fly case-conversion w. translate()
Subject: Re: [xsl] On-the-fly case-conversion w. translate() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:19:49 +0100 |
<xsl:if test= "@name [not (self::node() = following::Program/@name)]"> self::node() can be written more simply as . translate (following::Program/@name, abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz, ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ))]" This has come up already today (and is a faq) lthough I'm not sure what you'd search for. If you use a node set as an argument to a string function xslt1 takes the first node in document order in the set and uses that nodes string value, it ignores any other nodes. it (might be) a bit more efficient or at least clearer to use following-sibling on the element node rather than following from the attribute node, test="@name=following-sibling::Program/@name" tests if this nodes name attribute is equal to any of the following nodes names. test="translate(@name,$u,$l)=translate(following-sibling::Program/@name,$u.$l)" tests if this nodes name attribute is equal to the _immediately following_ Program nodes name attribute. In this case you can do test="following-sibling::Program/@name[translate(.,$u.$l) =translate(current()/@name,$u,$l)]" David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] On-the-fly case-conversion w., Shivani Goel | Thread | RE: [xsl] On-the-fly case-conversio, Michael Kay |
[xsl] On-the-fly case-conversion w., Shivani Goel | Date | RE: [xsl] On-the-fly case-conversio, Michael Kay |
Month |