[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty sequence' to function?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty sequence' to function?
From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:06:16 +0100
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Welch" <ajwelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty sequence' to function?
if you don't use as then an xsl:variable with content and no
select attribute produces a temporary tree, what we used to
lovingly call a result tree fragment.
<xsl:variable name="x">hello</xsl:variable>
$x is (a sequence of one) document node that has a single
text node child that has string value "hello"
<xsl:variable name="y" as="string?">hello</xsl:variable>
$x is (a sequence of one) string with value "hello"
Is this really the case? Does it really mean that the processor doesn't
construct the temporary tree (and then atomise it?) - if so then it's
really useful.
Yes, he didn't just make that up :)
A not so fond farewell, more of a good riddance, to result tree fragments.
Joe
|