[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty sequence' to function?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty sequence' to function?
From: "Andrew Welch" <ajwelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:04:16 +0100

M.K:
> It's presumably failing because you declared the type on
> xsl:param not to accept an empty sequence. For example if you
> write <xsl:param name="p" as="xs:string"/> then an empty
> sequence will not be accepted. If you change it to <xsl:param
> name="p" as="xs:string?"/> then an empty sequence is OK.

When is it a good idea to type a variable/param as "xs:string?" - what
benefits does it bring over not specifying the "as" attribute?

thanks
andrew

Current Thread

[xsl] Possible to pass 'empty sequence' to function?
- chris - 30 Mar 2005 20:02:40 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 30 Mar 2005 20:15:43 -0000
  - Message not available
    - chris - 30 Mar 2005 21:04:59 -0000
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Andrew Welch - 31 Mar 2005 10:04:36 -0000 <=
    - David Carlisle - 31 Mar 2005 10:35:28 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 31 Mar 2005 10:40:57 -0000
  - Andrew Welch - 31 Mar 2005 10:59:20 -0000
    - Joe Fawcett - 31 Mar 2005 11:06:46 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty s, chris	Thread	Re: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty s, David Carlisle
[xsl] RE: Resolving Variable Redefi, SianMace	Date	Re: [xsl] RE: Resolving Variable Re, David Carlisle
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor