RE: [xsl] XSLT 1 and 2 differences (d-o-e and namespaces)

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1 and 2 differences (d-o-e and namespaces)
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:01:52 -0000

> which sounds that d-o-e is an useful feature sometimes. So
> why it is considered not a mandatory feature in 2.0..?

It has never been a mandatory feature. It's not supported by all 1.0
processors.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] XSLT 1 and 2 differences (d-o-e and namespaces), (continued)
- Michael Kay - Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:59:53 -0000
- Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:00:28 -0600
  - Midsummer Sun - Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:46:36 +0530
    - M. David Peterson - Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:22:16 -0700
    - Michael Kay - Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:01:52 -0000 <=
    - Message not available
    - Midsummer Sun - Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:20:21 +0530

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1 and 2 differences , M. David Peterson	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 1 and 2 differences , Midsummer Sun
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1 and 2 differences , Michael Kay	Date	[xsl] Selecting vs matching text() , Ross, Douglas
	Month

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

RE: [xsl] XSLT 1 and 2 differences (d-o-e and namespaces)