[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Transformation of


Subject: Re: [xsl] Transformation of
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:06:44 +1100

> We can argue about it - it depends upon the parser - a parser that
> rejected such names would not be in-compliant.

Can you quote any section of the XML Spec which prescribes that an xml
parser must raise an error on a name beginning with the string "xml",
or with any string which would
match (('X'|'x') ('M'|'m') ('L'|'l')) ?

If there isn't such a text, then a parser rejecting such names is not
compliant with the spec.


Cheers,

Dimitre.


On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:21:11 -0800 (PST), Colin Paul Adams
<colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>    Dimitre> Reserved does not meen invalid or forbidden. The meaning
>    Dimitre> is: "You can still use such names but you have been
>    Dimitre> warned. Some nice day you'll wake up to find that the
>    Dimitre> nice name "xmlns2" you used has been given exclusively to
>    Dimitre> "XML Namespaces -- 2" and your source xml documents have
>    Dimitre> suddenly changed their meaning".
> 
>    Dimitre> This is not something to argue about as anyone can try
>    Dimitre> and see for themselves that an XML parser allow the use
>    Dimitre> of such names..
> 
> We can argue about it - it depends upon the parser - a parser that
> rejected such names would not be in-compliant.
> --
> Colin Paul Adams
> Preston Lancashire


Current Thread
Keywords
xml