[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] which is faster?
Subject: Re: [xsl] which is faster? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:18:31 GMT |
without a sample input we can't run the thing so you'll have to be more explicit in your description. > This line of code is messing the whole thing up. generates error message? generates wrong output? Causes your machine to reboot? > otherwise when I try to load data from > it, and it doesn't exist, the whole stylesheet ceeses to work. using document() on a document that doesn't exist is a recoverable error in XSLT (unfortunately). The system can either generate an error (and stop) or return an empty node set in which case your xsl:if will test false and work as you expect. So you'll need to check your system#s documentation to see what it does in this case. Some systems (eg saxon) it's a user configurable option what the system does on recoverable errors. There is no portable way in XSLT to test for the existence of a file. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] which is faster?, tom . kirkpatrick | Thread | Re: [xsl] which is faster?, tom . kirkpatrick |
[xsl] Using XML/XSLT for forms in ., Julian Voelcker | Date | Re: [xsl] which is faster?, David Carlisle |
Month |
Keywords