[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 05:34 AM 1/20/2005, Andrew wrote:
Or to put it another way, one should be aware that certain kinds of validation entail their own kinds of transformation. :->
RE: [xsl] xslt phases for FAQ, was Reading the XML declaration using XSL
Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt phases for FAQ, was Reading the XML declaration using XSL From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:01:38 -0500 |
At 05:34 AM 1/20/2005, Andrew wrote:
> Phase 0, XML parse: > Resolve entities; > Determine source doc encoding > Validate (if using a validating parser with validation switched on) > Catalog resolution (if appropriate) > Build the internal model of the source document > Build the internal model of the stylesheet
As a subheader under validation I would add 'Populate defaulted values if using DTD/XML Schema, thankfully not an issue if using RNG'
Or to put it another way, one should be aware that certain kinds of validation entail their own kinds of transformation. :->
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt phases for FAQ, was, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt phases for FAQ, was, Pawson, David |
Re: [xsl] using boolean to compare , dan sherman | Date | Re: [xsl] optimization for very lar, Kevin Rodgers |
Month |