[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] binary XML
Subject: Re: [xsl] binary XML From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:00:47 +0000 |
Well, i'm thinking if the "binarizers" will be made by diferent companies, what is the chance that something like what happened to Javascript, CSS and even HTML may happen, leading to incompatibilities betwen "binarizers" and "debinarizers"... On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:38:57 -0000, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Frankly, i wonder if the work now done in XML/XSL will have to be > > rewitern or redefined because of that... > > One of the reasons that XSLT is defined in terms of an abstract tree model > of a document is that it's completely unaffected if someone chooses to > define a different on-the-wire transfer syntax. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] binary XML, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] binary XML, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] My brain is hurting, Geert Josten | Date | Re: [xsl] My brain is hurting, António Mota |
Month |
Keywords